The Vojvodina Hungarian Cultural Strategy

One of my name, and the other crying. Name, because under the auspices of the National Council is a 267 pages long - very sophisticated, holistic - a document was well-known, well-known public involvement (involved in the project, institutions and associations, associates, or members not to speak). Crying because I am convinced - and I'm not the illúzióromboló, but the plaintive about it - that the envisaged plans and ideas is a very important part of the described form will never be realized. I think the most valuable part of the document detailed assessment of the situation (although there are certain qualifications, evaluations, I can not remember), the strategy for the years ahead, but more like my wishlist (which of course I would like to "signatory"), rather than realistic plans. I think this is just to get to wishlist narrowing to a minimum, which is behind, however, as one, indivisible sorakoznunk be, and we support it. I do not know is that we are able to do so. The undisputed value of the document that it exists at all, you can leave a response, refine, constructive criticism (and not criticize!). Certainly we have much to argue about it, also some details about quarreling, and it would be good. Would not it be nice to have a strategy initiators, makers themselves, letting the big task without support. The longer the acquiescence of the lethargy would signal a kind of inertia that takes us in any direction, and that we can not change, no matter what we try to influence in this direction, plan, or plan a strategy and implement it for at least some parts.zentai
I did not want to do to deal with players, mainly because megszólítottként Metropolitan Museum of Senta as a leader, and I speak as a historian museologist. But as such I can not for certain elzárkózni the context, because the museum is not an independent institution of Zenta in 1977 from the Thurzo Louis Cultural Centre operates within. Senta then fusion of the individual institutions were not well thought-out step, but rather a political decision to bypass the professional interests. This issue is now the policy should be corrected, just professional reasons, primarily because - with more conversation with - the feeling that the institutions of political interests, the separation has not taken place.
However, the document highlighted as an institution is not the City Library or the City Museum, but the Centre in which formal reasons, to understand (as these institutions are not separate legal entities), the priority activities for káderproblémákról speaking, however, (ethnography and art collections) of the document is always Museum talks.
Becoming independent in the future the question of who can not leave just because the document would be analytical about the museum in relation to issues raised, highlighting the specific deficiencies. However, I always emphasize that the museum is as much scientific and cultural institutions: already established cultural values ​​gather, verify, process and publish (that is, but also creates a different kind of values). This is because many people do not see or do not understand why he made that while the general education programs (exhibitions, events) is easier to get support, while the workshops, infrastructure (or even professional training), only a little. As a relatively short period of time managed to fix up the building of the museum, but a restoration workshop and warehouses are still unacceptable, shameful condition.
Museums may be explained by the complex nature of the fact that the document is missing káderekkel related to archeology, art historians to historians speak of, although this is not so simple. This basic education, so to speak, as curatorial knowledge is required (eg, protection of works of art). Hungary already has, but Serbia has no expertise in the universities, museology, and therefore the lack of a better variety of forms of professional development (seminars, conferences) would be desirable to support. The Museum of Zenta put the document mentions the need to support the application of an art historian and an archaeologist, but I would add that the situation is even worse. The museum, in principle three museologist is but one who is "full time" ethnographers, one who is half-time ethnographers, part-time museum educator, and one historian, however, program manager (in addition to other collections: régészetit, numizmatikait, képzőművészetit "handles"). In addition to the Art Colony was established in 1952 (the document as "Senta camp of artists' call, which is quite confusing, but it is a bit offensive), the institution itself, long history and tradition required (do not). The Graphic Workshop created in 1999, the work would be desirable to the next level increased, but this is not only space, equipment, but some ama "Human Resources" is missing.